adiocarbon Dating, Ultrafiltration, Bone collagen

This should consist of 10 scholarly/ peer-reviewed sources.  Your final paper should adhere to the following requirements: 1) A Title. You must have a title for your paper that conveys significant information (refer to the articles/book chapters read in class for example). 2) Introduction that states the topic and purpose of your paper (1 paragraph); 3) Brief overview/background information on your topic. Include the significance (why is it important?) of your topic to the field of Archaeology (1 or 2 paragraphs); 4) Literature review of the ten or more sources you used in researching your topic (3 or more paragraphs). This section should not be a series of summaries of individual articles without a discussion of the relationships among them. Incorporate transitions and connections from one author’s perspective into another.  5) Conclusion. In a paragraph, summarize the current state of knowledge based on your sources and suggest avenues for further research. 6) References Cited / Citations. You must provide proper in-text citation (parenthetical references) for all ideas and information not original to you using your prefered writing style.  7) Length: A minimum of 2500 words in length (approximately 10-pages double space) Note: the bibliography does not count toward the word count/paper length.

45819436 minutes ago

I also added a doc with all 10 sources

Boudin, Mathieu, Boeckx, Pascal, Vandenabeele, Peter, & Van Strydonck, Mark. (2013). Improved radiocarbon dating for contaminated archaeological bone collagen, silk, wool and hair samples via cross-flow nanofiltrated amino acids. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 27(18), 2039–2050. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6652

Brock, F., Higham, T., Ditchfield, P., & Ramsey, C. (2010). Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (Orau). Radiocarbon, 52(1), 103-112. doi:10.1017/S0033822200045069

Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T., Bowles, A., & Hedges, R. (2004). Improvements to the Pretreatment of Bone at Oxford. Radiocarbon, 46(1), 155-163. doi:10.1017/S0033822200039473

Brock, F., Ramsey, C., & Higham, T. (2007). Quality Assurance of Ultrafiltered Bone Dating. Radiocarbon, 49(2), 187-192. doi:10.1017/S0033822200042107

Higham, T., Jacobi, R., & Ramsey, C. (2006). AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Ancient Bone Using Ultrafiltration. Radiocarbon, 48(2), 179-195. doi:10.1017/S0033822200066388

McCullagh, J., Marom, A., & Hedges, R. (2010). Radiocarbon Dating of Individual Amino Acids from Archaeological Bone Collagen. Radiocarbon, 52(2), 620-634. doi:10.1017/S0033822200045653

Minami, M., Yamazaki, K., Omori, T., & Nakamura, T. (2013). Radiocarbon dating of VIRI bone samples using ultrafiltration. Nuclear Instruments And Methods In Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions With Materials And Atoms, 294, 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.06.016

Olsen, J., Heinemeier, J., Bennike, P., Krause, C., Margrethe Hornstrup, K., & Thrane, H. (2008). Characterisation and blind testing of radiocarbon dating of cremated bone. Journal Of Archaeological Science, 35(3), 791-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.011

Wood, R., Ramsey, C., & Higham, T. (2010). Refining Background Corrections for Radiocarbon Dating of Bone Collagen at Orau. Radiocarbon, 52(2), 600-611. doi:10.1017/S003382220004563X

Wood, R. (2015). From revolution to convention: the past, present and future of radiocarbon dating. Journal of Archaeological Science, 56, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.019

 

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Open chat
1
Hello. Can we help you?