The Efficiency of Green Technology Innovation in Organizations

* Follow the attached Rubric (exactly).
* Focus on Data analysis.
* Use Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix.
* Try to focus more (but don’t limit the report) on Harnessing solar energy & Solar power & Self-powered buildings.
* Focus on (United Arab Emirates).
* Show a comparison of the added value of green technology over the traditional technology.
* Use the attached proposed file for questions and surveys and try to develop upon it (not limited to the file).
* Develop a survey from the attached proposal file (don’t limit with it)

* Get answers for a survey for analysis through SPSS.

1Written Report on Quantitative Research

Methods

It will be in the form of a report and should be typed or word-processed; it should comprise no less than 4, 000 words.Once your assignment has been marked, you will receive written feedback from your tutor.Your attention is drawn to the consequences of breaching the University’s policies and regulations concerning assessment, including issues relating to plagiarism.It is essential to give acknowledgment of any external sources,makingitclearwhetherthereferenceisbeing directly quoted or indirectly consulted. Not to do this may constitute plagiarism, which is considered a severe offense against academic integrity –and against which the official sanctions are severe! In essence, the report should be expressed in your own words, not those of other writers. You may, naturally, quote other sources, but when doing so should attribute and reference thisappropriately.Assignment aimThisassignmentaimstoshowyourability/understandingforcollectingtherelevantdataandchoosingthe relevant statistical models to analyze such data so as to addressing a research question and testing your hypothesis. The assignment looks at your ability to present the output of your results and also giving accurateinterpretations.Assignment taskYou have been asked to prepare a short report (with a word limit of 4,000 words) addressing specific research questions (from your choice based on one (or more) essential article(s)). This report focuses on three major sections:Section 1: Research method (20%)You are going to explain: a) how you have selected your sample and how you have collected your data; b) how you have measured your variables; and c) what is your empirical model(s) which will be used to analyze your data in order to answer your research question(s).Section 2: Data analysis (50%)You should present your results using any/or all forms of presentations, including graphs, figures, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis/ statistical tests (parametric and/or non-parametric analyses).Section 3: Discussion (10%)You should give explanations of the meaning of your results and whether or not these results support your research question(s) and hypothesis.The remaining (style and presentation of the report) 10% will be for the theoretical framework for your report (to highlight the research question(s) and hypotheses).Oral Presentation 10% will be for your oral presentation

2Please go through the following rubricCriteriaA90% plusB +85-89%B80-84%C-C+70-79%F69% or belowMarksMethodologyA clear and deepWell-justifiedMethodologyMethodologyNot clear what12knowledge of methodologymethodology andadequately justifiedmot adequatelykind of studymarksused and of underpinningusefuland chosenjustified and/orwas undertaken.theoriesconsiderations ofmethodsnot clear whatChoice ofUnderstanding ofunderpinningsatisfactorilykind of studymethodsalternative approachestheoriesexplainedwas undertakeninappropriateFully justified choice ofAwareness ofSome awareness ofChoice ofand poorlyresearch methodsalternativewider researchmethodsexecutedClear indication ofapproachesmethodologiesinappropriate orNostrengths and limitations ofChoice of researchChoice of researchpoorly executedconsideration ofapproachmethods wellmethods largelyUnderpinningunderpinningjustifiedsuitable andtheories nottheoriesIndication ofjustifiedconsidered at astrengths andStrengths andsatisfactory levellimitations oflimitations ofStrengths andapproachmethodologylimitationsconsideredinadequatelyconsideredAnalysisAnalysis carried outGood analysis ofSatisfactoryAnalysis of data,Little or noaccurately and with highdata / concepts oranalysis of data,concepts oranalysis of data,degree of competence intheoretical ideas inconcepts ortheoretical ideasconcepts orline with methodologicalline withtheoretical ideasis uncertaintheoretical ideas;30and theoretical premisesmethodologicalperhaps with someand/or overlydescriptive,marksSelection, interpretation,and theoreticaldeviation fromdescriptive orsimplistic andcomparison, evaluation,premisestheoreticalanecdotalanecdotal and/orand integration of materialSelection,premisesand/or incorrectincorrectfrom empirical or libraryinterpretation,SatisfactoryInadequateNegligible abilitysources are extremelycomparison,selection,selection,to select,effectiveevaluation andinterpretation,interpretation,interpret,Significant insight achievedintegration ofcomparison,comparison,compare,Judgments strongly basedmaterial fromevaluation andevaluation andevaluate and/oron critical appraisalempirical or libraryintegration ofintegration ofintegrate materialsources arematerial frommaterial fromfrom empiricaleffective, perhapsempirical or libraryempirical oror library sourceswith somesources, withlibrary sourcesomissionslimitationsLittle or noUseful insightSome insightsinsights achievedachievedachievedJudgementsJudgements areJudgements showshow lack ofbased on criticalsome but limitedcritical appraisalappraisalcritical appraisalDiscussion andDiscussion highly relevantDiscussionDiscussion ofLittle or noNo adequate6 marksconclusionsto research question andrelevant torelevance but notdiscussion ofevidence of:literatureresearch questioncomprehensiverelevanceinsight achieved;Appropriate discussion ofand literatureConclusionConclusions maycritical appraisal;limitationsSome discussionprovides summarylack any insightand/orLogically developed andof limitationsdue todiscussion ofpertinent conclusionsConclusioninadequaterelevancesummarises issuesanalysisNo conclusionsand considersmadeimplications

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
Open chat
1
Hello. Can we help you?