explain whether and/or why a significant disparity in access to material resources justifies or does not justify a claim that a group with significantly less material resources is oppressed

Using at least two different readings from the course, explain whether and/or why a significant disparity in access to material resources justifies or does not justify a claim that a group with significantly less material resources is oppressed. In such societies, does significant disparity in the material resources between groups of people suffice to justify the claim that less well-resourced groups are oppressed? If the disparity alone does not suffice to support the claim of oppression, what further conditions are required, in addition to significant disparity in material resources, to support a claim of oppression? Under what circumstances is a significant disparity in access to material resources compatible with the absence of oppression?
disparity alone does not suffice to support the claim of oppression, what further conditions are required, in addition to significant disparity in material resources, to support a claim of oppression? Under what circumstances is a significant disparity in access to material resources compatible with the absence of oppression?