Please review this essay and mark your thoughts to the essay itself. I need to see what you think about this essay and for specific part need to be changed. Please use REVIEW function in Word, that will be easier for both of us.
I realized that I haven’t really included any in- text citations yet, so whenever you need to comment on that I guess you can just skip it as i will add them later.
BELOW IS THE PROMPT:
Final Research Paper
Length: 2000-2500 words
Description:
What did you learn about your chosen topic or theme through your research?
Working with the sources from the Annotated References assignment and developing it further, you are to write an academic research paper, in which you will compare/contrast, synthesize, analyze, evaluate and critique the sources and forward your own opinionated central claim or argument in this assignment. You will write a structured research essay of good quality. It requires you to use credible secondary sources.
You will forward your own opinionated central claim or argument within a structured evaluation in this assignment rather than only comparing the authors ideas and research.
As you are not the expert in this field of research, you can show where one author makes a compelling point and how another author might expand on or contrast that point. In other words, what did you learn about this topic or theme through your research?
Organization of the Paper:
Title: Provide a suitable title for your essay based on the topic of your interest.
Introduction: An introduction with a thesis statement and summary of main points to be discussed in the essay. It begins with an attention-getter and short background information about the topic under discussion. Essentially, an introduction accomplishes two things. First, it gives a sense of both your topic and your approach to that topic, which is why it is common to make your thesis statement a part of the introduction. Second, an introduction compels your readers interest and makes them want to read on and find out what your paper has to say. Clearly state the thesis statement that directly connect with the title and provides your central claim/argument with some points which will be analyzed/explained/described in the body paragraphs.
The Middle Section: The middle section comprises of interpretive analysis, synthesis, comparison, contrast, evaluation, critique and persuasion where all points stated in the introduction are developed and appropriately supported with all sources ethically cited.
Conclusion: An original and fitting conclusion to the essay. Your conclusion should give your readers something new to think about, a reason not to forget your essay as soon as the reading is done. Make it impactful. What did you learn from your research on this topic?
References: Your paper should end with a proper APA formatted References page where all sources are ethically included and properly documented. Include at least six authentic sources (journal articles, book chapters, authentic newspaper/magazine article, authentic governmental or non-governmental website article; Wikipedia is not an authentic source). You might also cite additional sources that can help strengthen your point or refute alternative arguments.
Formatting:
Rubric
|
Categories |
|||||
|
Design 1 point |
The document conforms to the design specifications of the instructor and APA style. The document includes a correctly formatted title page and running header. The margins and line spaces are correct. Headings are included in the document and are parallel and informative. 1 point. |
The document attempts to conform to the design specifications of the instructor and APA style. The document includes a correctly formatted title page and running header. The margins and line spaces are mostly correct. Headings are sometimes included in the documents. 0.5 point |
The document does not conform to the design specifications of the instructor and APA style. The document is missing a correctly formatted title page and running header. The margins and line spaces may be incorrect. Headings may be missing. 0.0 point. |
||
|
Introduction 3 points |
The introduction orients the readers, includes effective attention-getter and background material, sets the stage for the paper and states the thesis. The purpose is clearly established early in the document. The thesis introduces the topic and is worded clearly and concisely. 3 points |
The introduction, for the most part, orients the reader and includes attention-getter and background material, sets the stage for the paper and states the thesis (although one of these elements may not be fully developed). The thesis introduces the topic and is worded clearly but not concisely. 2.5 point. |
The introduction attempts to orient the reader but is not entirely successful. It may be weak in providing background material, setting the stage for the paper or stating the thesis. The purpose can be understood from the document. The thesis begins to introduce the topic but may not be worded clearly and concisely. 2 points. |
Although the introduction attempts to orient the reader it is not successful. The purpose of the document is generally unclear. The thesis begins to introduce the topic though it may not worded clearly or concisely. 1.5 point. |
Introduction is incomplete. No thesis stated. 0.0 point. |
|
Analysis 10 points |
It provides excellent analysis and synthesis, and analysis is well woven with interpretation. 10 points. |
It provides good analysis and synthesis, and analysis is well woven with interpretation. 8 points. |
It provides fair analysis and synthesis, and analysis is well woven with interpretation. 6 points. |
It provides some analysis and synthesis, and analysis is well woven with interpretation. 4 points. |
Does not have analysis, synthesis and interpretation at all. 0 points. |
|
Conclusion 2 points. |
The concluding paragraph successfully draws the paper to a conclusion, while going beyond mere summary. It does not introduce new ideas, although it looks ahead, or invites readers to consider a deeper aspect of the topic. 2 points. |
The concluding paragraph draws the paper to a conclusion, while going beyond mere summary. It does not introduce new ideas, although it may look ahead, or invite readers to consider a deeper aspect of the topic, though possibly not clearly or concisely. 1.5 points |
The concluding paragraph successfully draws the paper to a conclusion, while attempting to go beyond mere summary, though possibly not successfully. It does not introduce new ideas. 1 point |
The concluding paragraph marginally successfully draws the paper to a conclusion, though may not go beyond mere summary. It may introduce new ideas that are not appropriate for a conclusion. 0.5 point |
The concluding paragraph is missing or is unsuccessful at going beyond mere summary. 0.0 point. |
|
Writing Fluency 4 points. |
The paragraphs exhibit unity and coherence and are sufficiently developed. The sentences are clear, concise, and easy to follow. They show variety and use good vocabulary. 4 points. |
The paragraphs exhibit unity and coherence. Most of them are sufficiently developed. The sentences are clear and concise; most show variety and good vocabulary but may be occasionally imprecise. 3.5 points. |
Some of the paragraphs exhibit unity and coherence and are sufficiently developed. The sentences may vary in quality, with some being clear, but others being wordy or hard to follow. The vocabulary is acceptable but may be occasionally simplistic, imprecise or repetitive. 3 points. |
A few paragraphs exhibit unity and coherence. Some are developed. Sentences may be hard to follow, wordy, and/or unclear. The vocabulary may be imprecise and/or inaccurate. 2.5 points |
Paragraphs repeatedly lack unity and/or coherence, or they are not sufficiently developed. Sentences may be frequently hard to follow, wordy, and/or unclear. The vocabulary may be consistently imprecise and/or inaccurate. 2.00 points. |
|
Grammar and Mechanics 4 points |
Sentences are correct. Exhibit few or no grammatical and mechanical errors. 4 points. |
Most of the sentences are correct. Exhibit a few grammatical and mechanical errors. 3.5 points |
Some of the sentences are correct. Exhibit several grammatical and mechanical errors. 3 points. |
Many of the sentences are incorrect. Exhibit numerous grammatical and mechanical errors. 2.5 points. |
Most of the sentences are incorrect with many grammatical and mechanical errors. 2.00 points. |
|
APA Format 4 points. |
Sources are cited correctly in the document and on the reference page. 4 points. |
Sources are cited, but there are a few errors in the format. 3.5 points. |
Sources are cited, but there are several errors in the format. 3 point. |
Some of the sources are not cited and/or the format is not correct. 2 point. |
Sources are not cited at all. 0.0 point. |
|
Peer Review 2 points. |
Excellent peer review 2 points. |
Good peer review 1.5 point. |
Fair peer review 1 point. |
Minimal peer review. 0.5 point |
No peer review done 0.0 point |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments