Practical Connection paper
course : Information Governance working as software developer
It is a priority that students are provided with strong educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This assignment is a written assignment where students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and put into practice within their own career.
Provide a reflection of at least 700 words (or 3 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment. If you are not currently working, share times when you have or could observe these theories and knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in your field of study.
Provide a 700 word (or 3 pages double spaced) minimum reflection.· Use of proper APA formatting and citations. If supporting evidence from outside resources is used those must be properly cited.· Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.·
Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired work environment.·
You should not provide an overview of the assignments assigned in the course.
The assignment asks that you reflect how the knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives were applied or could be applied in the workplace.
Alves de Freitas, Andrade dos Reis, E., Senra Michel, W., Gronovicz, M. E., & de Macedo Rodrigues, M. A. (2013). Information Governance, Big Data and Data Quality. 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, 1142–1143.Tallon, Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178.
Tallon. (2013). Corporate Governance of Big Data: Perspectives on Value, Risk, and Cost. Computer (Long Beach, Calif.), 46(6), 32–38.Turel, Liu, P., & Bart, C. (2017). Board-Level Information Technology Governance Effects on Organizational Performance: The Roles of Strategic Alignment and Authoritarian Governance Style. Information Systems Management, 34(2), 117–136.Simberkoff. (2016). 5 best practices for information governance and risk management. KM World, 25(8), S30–.
Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles 2017 ARMA International, www.arma.org/principles.MacLennan, Alan. (2017). Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy, pp.10 – 44. Facet Publishing.Hulme. (2012). Information Governance: Sharing the IBM approach. Business Information Review, 29(2), 99–104.New IGRM version recognizes value of privacy, security. (2013). The Information Management Journal, 47(1), 16–.Saffady. (2015). Records management or information governance? The Information Management Journal, 49(4), 38–.
Calderaro, & Craig, A. J. S. (2020). Transnational governance of cybersecurity: policy challenges and global inequalities in cyber capacity building. Third World Quarterly, 41(6), 917–938.Ali, Green, P., Robb, A., & Masli, A. (2022). Governing information technology (IT) investment: A contingency perspective on organization’s IT investment goals. Australian Journal of Management, 47(1), 3–23.DeNardis. (2017). Cybersecurity Governance. In The Global War for Internet Governance (pp. 86–106). Yale University Press.
Manning. (2020). “Rifled Precision”: Using E-discovery Technology to Streamline Books and Records Litigation. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 22(3), 663–.Ward, Purwin, C., Sipior, J. C., & Volonino, L. (2009). Recognizing the Impact of E-Discovery Amendments on Electronic Records Management. Information Systems Management, 26(4), 350–356.Vinjumur. (2018). Predictive Coding Techniques With Manual Review to Identify Privileged Documents in E-Discovery. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Vogel, & Rood, D. K. (2019). Dealing with subpoena requests for digital data. Journal of Accountancy, 227(3), 12–13.
Tallon, Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178.Brooks. (2019). Perspectives on the relationship between records management and information governance. Records Management Journal (London, England), 29(1/2), 5–17.Bhatia, Douglas, E. K., & Most, M. (2020). Blockchain and records management: disruptive force or new approach? Records Management Journal (London, England), 30(3), 277–286.
Borgman. (2018). Open Data, Grey Data, and Stewardship: Universities at the Privacy Frontier. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 33(2), 365–412.Henttonen. (2017). Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science, 17(3), 285–303.MacLennan, Alan. (2017). Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy, pp. 113 – 123. Facet Publishing.Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. (2010). Beyond Privacy, Beyond Rights—Toward a “Systems” Theory of Information Governance. California Law Review, 98(6), 1853–1885.
Lappin, Jackson, T., Matthews, G., & Onojeharho, E. (2019). The defensible deletion of government email. Records Management Journal (London, England), 29(1/2), 42–56.Bojana, K. (2018). Why your information governance strategy must start with email. Jatheon.Gundling, M. (2019). What every company should know about email management for Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance.
Haynes. (2016). Social media, risk and information governance. Business Information Review, 33(2), 90–93.Olly Jackson. (2018). GDPR: companies at risk over unstructured data. International Financial Law Review.Madhava. (2011). 10 things to know about preserving social media. The Information Management Journal, 45(5), 33–.
Chhabra, & Bala, M. (2018). A Comparative Study of Data Deduplication Strategies. 2018 First International Conference on Secure Cyber Computing and Communication (ICSCCC), 68–72.Franks. (2015). New technologies, new challenges: Records retention in a cloud environment. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 39(2), 191–.Luciana Duranti & Corinne Rogers. (2019). Trusting Records in the Cloud: The Creation, Management, and Preservation of Trustworthy Digital Content , pp 119 – 131. Facet Publishing.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more