Week 6 Discussion: Kant’s Ethics and Our Duty

Week 6 Discussion: Kant’s Ethics and Our Duty

Introduction Kant’s famous First Formulation of the Categorical Imperative reads, “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” Kant taught morality as a matter of following maxims of living that reflect absolute laws. “Universal” is a term that allows for no exceptions, and what is universal applies always and everywhere. Don’t forget about the second formulation of the categorical imperative which states, “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means.” It is just as important.

Initial Post Instructions For the initial post, address one of the following sets of questions:

1. What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side given a contemporary debate, such as those concerning animal rights, stem cell research, abortion, the death penalty, and so forth?

Writing Requirements

· Minimum of 3 posts (1 initial & 2 follow-up)

· Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source)

IMPORTANT NOTES THAT WILL GUIDE YOU WHEN WRITING THIS ASSIGNMENT

What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side given a contemporary debate

Introduction

In a contemporary debate, one must take into account their personal and/or communal ethical factors.

Personal factors

Personal factors are the psychological and emotional aspects of a person’s identity. They include:

• Self-esteem (the sense of self-worth)
• Morality (the beliefs about right and wrong)

Communal factors

A number of factors, both personal and communal, may be involved in determining the moral position of either side.

• The moral position of the group: In this regard, it is important to consider whether or not individuals within a community are willing to cooperate with one another and share resources (e.g., food). If they are not willing, then any individual act taken by one member will be seen as selfish and harmful rather than beneficial for society at large. However, if everyone were supportive of each other’s needs then such an act would be considered compassionate rather than selfish because it helped others without needing anything in return from them (since those people already provided their own things). In this case there would be no need for charity because everything could just flow freely between all parties involved.”

In a contemporary debate, one must take into account their personal and/or communal ethical factors.

In a contemporary debate, one must take into account their personal and/or communal ethical factors. For example, you may be asked to think about whether or not someone should be able to have children as a result of in vitro fertilization. This decision would be made on the basis of your own personal ethical beliefs about whether it is right or wrong for people who cannot biologically procreate due to various reasons (e.g., age) to have children through artificial means. You should consider how this would impact other people’s lives if they were allowed access to such technologies; after all, these are not just individual decisions but rather social ones that affect everyone involved in an organization or community at large!

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is important to remember that ethics is personal and communal. Ethics can be used as a tool for good or evil, depending on the person or group involved. When considering the moral position of either side in an argument about social issues, one must take into account their personal and/or communal ethical factors.

WOULD YOU LIKE A CUSTOM ESSAY JUST FOR YOU? CLICK “Continue to Order” or “Get a Quote” below to continue.

Get Assignment Help- Confidentially!

***Absolutely NO Plagiarism

***All writing is original.