Write 3 to 4 paragraphs about empiricism and Locke’s arguments for it,

Write 3 to 4 paragraphs about empiricism and Locke’s arguments for it, do you agree with its central claim that all ideas and all knowledge come from experience, i.e. is a posteriori?   Can Locke’s explanation of how we get ideas from experience account for the ideas that Plato and Descartes said could not come from experience:  infinity, goodness, and perfection?

KEY TAKEAWAYS BEFORE ATTEMPTING THIS ASSIGNMENT

Write 3 to 4 paragraphs about empiricism and Locke’s arguments for it,

Introduction

What is Empiricism? Empiricism is a philosophy that states that we can only know things by experience. This means that our senses are the best way to gather information about the world around us. Locke was an empiricist because he believed that we could only know things through our senses and not by divine revelation or human intuition.

Locke’s argument for empiricism

Locke’s argument for empiricism is based on the idea that perception is better than the senses. He says that we can’t trust our senses because they’re unreliable and often lead us to mistaken conclusions. For example, when you look at a book or watch a movie, you see people talking and doing things in front of you—but what you’re seeing isn’t really happening at all! This makes sense if we consider how many different ways there are for something to appear: from shadows cast by light sources (as when looking up at the night sky) or reflections off water or glass surfaces (for example). If our eyes were reliable instruments of knowledge then none of these illusions would be possible; instead everything would be clear cut evidence of reality.”

How does he attempt to prove it?

Locke’s argument is based on the idea that we can only know what we experience directly. This means that we cannot infer anything about reality from our experiences unless they are directly linked to it. For example, if I were to perform an experiment and report back my results, this would not be sufficient proof of what happened in my experiment because there is no way for me to be sure that those results came from something other than chance or coincidence.

So why does Locke believe this? Well, he argues that one key reason why our senses give us incorrect information is because they cannot tell us whether or not something exists at all; instead of just detecting light or sound waves (or whatever), our senses also detect heat and pressure changes within their environment as well as various chemical reactions taking place within them! This means that every time you feel hungry after eating lunch at work today—you may actually be hungry for some reason other than just being physically full enough already :).

What are his arguments for why perception is better than the senses?

Locke’s main argument for why perception is better than the senses is that they are unreliable. When you see someone, you can only see one person at a time; this means that if there are multiple people around and you’re looking at them all at once, which would be impossible in reality because there would need to be an infinite number of eyes with infinite vision points (which does not exist), then each individual person will have their own unique perspective on what they’re seeing. Therefore, this means that no one can ever truly know what anyone else sees or feels because everyone has their own unique way of perceiving things.

Another reason Locke believes perception is better than the senses is because they aren’t uniform; every person’s senses work differently so we don’t know how accurate our perceptions were even though we think we did something right when experiencing them firsthand! This leads us down another rabbit hole: If our perceptions aren’t uniform then how could any two people ever agree on anything regarding our senses?

What about Locke’s explanations of causation and memory?

Next, Locke explains the cause of memory. He says that when an object touches our bodies, it transfers its shape to us and we can remember that shape as if it were caused by something else. For example, if you put an apple on your desk and then pick up another apple from the same place later, your hand will feel different because the two apples have had different shapes pressed against them. The same thing happens with our minds: when we see something (like a table), our minds retain its image in some way even though there is no physical contact between us and the thing itself (the table).

Locke also talks about how memory works when it comes to feelings like happiness and sadness: they aren’t stored in any one part of our brain but rather spread out throughout all parts of our bodies until they reach their final resting place where they are stored forevermore!

What else did Locke think about scientific method?

Locke was not only a philosopher, but also an intellectual. He was a natural philosopher who studied the natural world and wrote extensively on topics such as optics and astronomy. He also wrote extensively on moral philosophy and social commentary; his work includes Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), An Essay Concerning Civil Government (1689), Two Treatises of Government (1698) and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1705).

Locke’s most famous work is probably Second Treatise on Government, which was published in 1689 after being written in 1680-81 during his retirement from public service at Trinity College Dublin where he had been Vice Chancellor since 1676. It argues against absolute monarchy or any form of tyranny because it relies on consent rather than force to govern people; this makes it relevant today because modern governments rely so much on coercion through force or threats against their citizens’ lives or property rights–and these are all forms tyranny which Locke opposed vigorously throughout his life!

A lot of interesting stuff happened in Locke’s writings.

Locke was a great thinker, philosopher, scientist and writer. He was also a great teacher and social reformer.

Locke was born in London in 1632 to middle-class parents who were both Puritans. His father died when Locke was young, leaving him in charge of his mother and sister while they lived with relatives while he finished school at Westminster School (the oldest boy’s boarding school at that time). For almost a decade after graduating from Westminster School in 1650 with no intention of becoming an academic scholar or writer; Locke pursued other interests such as medicine or law making until he discovered how much fun it could be to learn how things worked by doing experiments instead!

Conclusion

Locke’s writings are a good place to start when thinking about empiricism. His arguments for empiricism were interesting and unique, but they leave us with plenty of unanswered questions. I hope that today’s article has given you some ideas on how to tackle these questions in your own research!

WOULD YOU LIKE A CUSTOM ESSAY JUST FOR YOU?

Get Assignment Help- Confidentially! 

Why Choose Ace Writing Center?

***Absolutely NO Plagiarism.

***All writing is original.

***Guaranteed Top Grade.

***24/7 Support

***100% Money Back Guarantee

***Free revision