| Unit 6 Assignment: Grading Rubric | Total Available Points = | 120 | ||||
| Instructions: enter score (0-4) in column F | ||||||
| Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Final | ||
| 0-1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score | Weight | Score |
| Criterion 1 Identifies a healthcare policy/legislation, names the policy/legislation and the date of implementation, identifies the state, county or local area pertaining to the policy | The assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Identifies that the policy/legislation, but does not specify the area of jurisdiction. The name and date of the policy/legislation is not mentioned. The policy/legislation identified is not a health policy/legislation. Content is not supported. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Identifies that the policy/legislation is at the local or state level, but does not specify the area of jurisdiction. The name and date of the policy/legislation is identified. The policy/legislation identified relates to healthcare but is not a health policy/legislation. Content is supported, references are not from credible sources. | Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking. Identifies the state, county or local area of jurisdiction for the policy/legislation. The name and date of the policy/legislation is clearly identified. The policy/legislation identified is a healthcare policy/legislation. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. | 10% | 0.00 |
| Criterion 2 Policy/legislation is summarized, all relevant facts are included, role of the APN is integrated throughout the paper | The assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. The policy/legislation is identified, some relevant information is included. No evidence of integration of the APN role pertaining to the policy/legislation. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). The policy/legislation is summarized, some relevant points are included. The relevance to the APN role is not fully integrated throughout the paper. Content is supported with references but not from credible sources. | Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking. The policy/legislation is summarized, with all relevant points included. The relevance to the APN role is fully integrated throughout the paper. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. | 10% | 0.00 |
| Criterion 3 Analyzes one strength and one weakness of the policy/legislation | The assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Identifies and describes one strength and one weakness of the policy/legislation. Content is not supported. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Identifies and describes one strength and one weakness of the policy/legislation. The strength and weakness identified do not have a major impact on the providers and consumers. Content is supported but not with references from credible sources. | Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking. Identifies and analyzes one strength and one weakness of the policy/legislation. The strength and weakness identified are significant and has major impact on the providers and consumers. Content is supported adequately with references from credible sources. | 20% | 0.00 |
| Criterion 4 Impact of policy on all consumer stakeholders is discussed | The assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Impact of policy/legislation on stakeholders are identified. The consumer stakeholders are not identified, positive or negative impacts are identified or discussed. Content is not supported. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Impact of policy/legislation on some consumer stakeholders is listed. Some of the consumer stakeholders are identified, positive or negative impacts are discussed. Content is supported but not with credible sources. | Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking. Impact of policy/legislation on all consumer stakeholders is discussed. All the consumer stakeholders are identified, positive and negative impacts are discussed. Content is supported with references from credible sources. | 20% | 0.00 |
| Criterion 5 Impact of policy on all provider stakeholders is discussed | The assignment does not address any or all of this section. | The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Impact of policy/legislation on stakeholders are identified. The provider stakeholders are not identified, positive or negative impacts are identified or discussed. Content is not supported. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Impact of policy/legislation on some consumer stakeholders is listed. Some of the provider stakeholders are identified, positive or negative impacts are discussed. Content is supported but not with credible sources. | Work demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking. Impact of policy/legislation on all provider stakeholders is discussed. All the consumer stakeholders are identified, positive and negative impacts are discussed. Content is supported with references from credible sources. | 20% | 0.00 |
| Length | Less than 3 pages. | NA | NA | At least 4 pages. | 10% | 0.00 |
| Format/Style | Did not follow APA format | Major errors with APA formatting | Text, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errors | Text, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. | 10% | 0.00 |
| 100% | 0.00 | |||||
| Final Score | 0 | |||||
| Percentage | 0.00% | |||||
| Feedback: | 4 |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments