Project 4 Security Plan and Memo

Security Plan and MemoRubric Name: Project 4: Security Plan and MemoRecommendation Memo Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1Introduce and Summarize Plan 10 pointsClearly introduces and summarizes the security plan. 8 pointsBasically introduces and summarizes the security plan. 6 pointsWeakly introduces and summarizes the security plan. 3 pointsLittle introduction or summary of the security plan. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsDoesn’t introduce or summarize the security plan.Format, Grammar and Punctuation (Memo) 5 pointsMS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. No grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 4 pointsMS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 3 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 2 pointsMS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 6 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 1 pointMS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. Less than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsNon-MS Word document using standard memo/letter formatting. More than 9 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.Security Strategy Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1Describes Strategy 13 pointsClearly describes the security strategy being proposed. Strategy covers the confidentiality, integrity and availability. 10 pointsBasically describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers most of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. 7 pointsWeakly describes the security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy covers some of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. 3 pointsLittle description of security strategy that is being proposed. Strategy may cover a few of the following: confidentiality, integrity and availability. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsNo description of security strategy solutions. Doesn’t address any of the following: confidentiality, integrity or availability.Link Solutions 13 pointsClearly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy. 10 pointsBasically describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy. 7 pointsWeakly describes the linkage between each technology and the strategy. 3 pointsLittle description of the linkage between each technology and the strategy. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsNo description of any linkage between each technology and the strategy.Network Diagram 13 pointsClear, detailed network diagram that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. 10 pointsBasic network diagram with some details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. 7 pointsNetwork diagram with weak details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. 3 pointsNetwork diagram with little or no details that describes how the technology fits within the infrastructure. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsMissing or no network diagram.Security Technologies Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1Describes Technologies 13 pointsClearly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least three (3) technologies. 10 pointsBasically describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least two (2) technologies. 7 pointsWeakly describes the technologies being proposed. Describe at least one (1) technology. 3 pointsLittle description of technologies being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsDoesn’t describe the technologies being proposed.Costs, ROI, Mitigation and Barriers 13 pointsClear and detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. 10 pointsBasic, but detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. 7 pointsWeak and poorly detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. 3 pointsLittle detailed description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors’ work.) 0 pointsNo sufficient details in the description of the associated costs, expected return on investment, mitigation of risks, and barriers to success for each technology being proposed.Finds and Applies Knowledge Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1Use of Authoritative Sources 5 pointsUsed at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No APA style errors in sources. 4 pointsUsed at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 1 APA errors in sources. 2 pointsUsed at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. One must be NIST SP 800-53. No more than 2 APA errors in sources. 1 pointMay have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May use NIST SP 800-53. May not have used APA style formatting. 0 pointsNo authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper. NIST SP 800-53 not mentioned.Citation of Sources 5 pointsAll sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper. 4 pointsAll but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper. 2 pointsAll but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper. 1 pointAll but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper. 0 pointsNo sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.Organization, Execution and Appearance Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1Formatting 5 pointsPrepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 4 pointsMS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 2 pointsMS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 1 pointMS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count. 0 pointsNon MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count.Grammar and Punctuation 5 pointsNo grammar, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 4 pointsLess than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 2 pointsLess than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 1 pointLess than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors. 0 pointsMore than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.Overall Score Level 514 or more Level 411 or more Level 38 or more Level 25 or more Level 10 or more