(1) How does Human Rights Watch establish that there is an obligation to prosecute serious international crimes? (section 2, beginning on pg. 10).

(2) What is the argument made in Section III: Marginalization and what is one example proving the point? (section 3, beginning on pg. 18)

(3) What is the price of inclusion and what is one example of inclusion hurting peace? (section 4, beginning on pg. 35)

(4) Human Rights Watch argues in section 5 that explicit and implicit amnesties don’t provide the hoped-for benefits. What evidence do they provide to bolster this argument? (section 5, beginning on pg. 57)

(5) How do peace plans that don’t hold war criminals accountable lead to renewed cycles of violence? What is one example of how this has happened? (section 6, beginning on pg. 75)

(6) How does international justice (in the form of international tribunals, international courts, or universal jurisdiction) strengthen the domestic rule of law in countries recovering from conflict? Provide one example. (section 7, beginning on pg. 93)

(7) How do international trials protect against revisionism? How did this work in the case of the former Yugoslavia? (section 8, beginning on pg. 117)

(8) How does holding war criminals accountable actually deter further crimes? Provide at least one example. (section 9, beginning on pg. 123).

https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/ij0709webwcover_1.pdf